Survival mechanisms of circulating tumor cells and their implications for cancer treatment.

Metastasis remains the principal trigger for relapse and mortality across diverse cancer types. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which originate from the primary tumor or its metastatic sites, traverse the vascular system, serving as precursors in cancer recurrence and metastasis. Nevertheless, before CTCs can establish themselves in the distant parenchyma, they must overcome significant challenges present within the circulatory system, including hydrodynamic shear stress (HSS), oxidative damage, anoikis, and immune surveillance. Recently, there has been a growing body of compelling evidence suggesting that a specific subset of CTCs can persist within the bloodstream, but the precise mechanisms of their survival remain largely elusive. This review aims to present an outline of the survival challenges encountered by CTCs and to summarize the recent advancements in understanding the underlying survival mechanisms, suggesting their implications for cancer treatment.

Inhibition of SQSTM1 S403 phosphorylation facilitates the aggresome formation of ubiquitinated proteins during proteasome dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Ubiquitin-proteasome-system-mediated clearance of misfolded proteins is essential for cells to maintain proteostasis and reduce the proteotoxicity caused by these aberrant proteins. When proteasome activity is inadequate, ubiquitinated proteins are sorted into perinuclear aggresomes, which is a significant defense mechanism employed by cells to combat insufficient proteasome activity, hence mitigating the proteotoxic crisis. It has been demonstrated that phosphorylation of SQSTM1 is crucial in regulating misfolded protein aggregation and autophagic degradation. Although SQSTM1 S403 phosphorylation is essential for the autophagic degradation of ubiquitinated proteins, its significance in proteasome inhibition-induced aggresome formation is yet unknown. Herein, we investigated the influence of SQSTM1 S403 phosphorylation on the aggresome production of ubiquitinated proteins during proteasome suppression. METHODS: We examined the phosphorylation levels of SQSTM1 S403 or T269/S272 in cells after treated with proteasome inhibitors or/and autophagy inhibitors, by western blot and immunofluorescence. We detected the accumulation and aggresome formation of ubiquitinated misfolded proteins in cells treated with proteasome inhibition by western blot and immunofluorescence. Furthermore, we used SQSTM1 phosphorylation-associated kinase inhibitors and mutant constructs to confirm the regulation of different SQSTM1 phosphorylation in aggresome formation. We examined the cell viability using CCK-8 assay. RESULTS: Herein, we ascertained that phosphorylation of SQSTM1 S403 did not enhance the autophagic degradation of ubiquitinated proteins during proteasome inhibition. Proteasome inhibition suppresses the phosphorylation of SQSTM1 S403, which facilitated the aggresome production of polyubiquitinated proteins. Interestingly, we found proteasome inhibition-induced SQSTM1 T269/S272 phosphorylation inhibits the S403 phosphorylation. Suppressing S403 phosphorylation rescues the defective aggresome formation and protects cells from cell death caused by unphosphorylated SQSTM1 (T269/S272). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that inhibition of SQSTM1 S403 phosphorylation facilitates the aggresome formation of ubiquitinated proteins during proteasome dysfunction. SQSTM1 T269/S272 phosphorylation inhibits the S403 phosphorylation, boosting the aggresome formation of ubiquitinated protein and shielding cells from proteotoxic crisis.